Contact Us
425-641-8010

888-88-EVICT

(888-883-8428)

Retainer Agreement

Online Contact Form

Free Eviction Forms
Pamphlet on Serving Notices

Serving Eviction Notices

Eviction Forms for use in Washington outside Seattle

In MS Word format

Notice to Pay Rent or Vacate ("Three-day Notice")

Notice to Comply or Vacate ("Ten-day Notice”)

Notice to Terminate Tenancy ("Twenty-day Notice”)

Eviction Forms for use in Seattle

In MS Word format

Notice to Pay Rent or Vacate ("Three-day Notice") - Seattle

Notice to Comply or Vacate ("Ten-day Notice") Seattle

Notice Terminating Tenancy (”Twenty-day Notice”)

Other Landlord Notices

In MS Word format

48-hour Notice to Enter

Post-tenancy Notice Regarding Deposits

Notice of Apparent Abandonment

Foreclosure
Both state and federal laws have recently been enacted fundamentally changing the process of gaining possession after foreclosure. Please contact us.
Rate Us
Wrong Summons?
Attention: The mandatory eviction summons has changed twice in recent years. Many landlord attorneys and eviction services are still using an out-of-date and defective eviction summons. If you would like us to review the eviction summons your landlord attorney or eviction service is using, or if you are a tenant facing eviction and would like us to review the eviction summons you were served, contact us.

Accepting Rent After Notice to Terminate Tenancy

A recent published Court of Appeals unlawful detainer case ruled on the issue of whether a landlord may accept rent after service of a notice terminating a month to month tenancy.[1] The court ruled that the landlord may accept such payments without waiving the notice. Read the rest of this entry »

Recent Unpublished Opinion Finds Tenant at Sufferance

In a recent unpublished opinion Division III of the Washington Court of Appeals held that despite the acceptance of rent the occupants of certain rental property were merely tenants at sufferance and subject to eviction via an unlawful detainer action.[1] Read the rest of this entry »

Implied Warranties in Commercial Leases

Courts in some jurisdictions have extended the implied warranty of habitability to commercial leases to find an implied warranty of fitness for intended purpose.[1] Some commentators find the implied warranty of fitness analogous to the implied warranty of merchantability in the Uniform Commercial Code.[2]

No Washington decision to date has found an implied warranty in commercial leases, but dicta in one opinion leaves the door open.[3]

In Olson the tenant rented dog kennels and two residences.  The court declined to apply the Foisy implied warranty of habitability.[4]

The court considered an earlier New Jersey opinion finding an implied warranty in a commercial lease and distinguished the facts of that case by noting that it was for an office space and thus for human occupancy and that the defects were latent defects in common areas and unlikely to be discovered by the tenant.

In contrast, the Olson tenant could see the defects and problems of the rented kennels, accepted the leased premises in “as is” condition, and had operated the kennels for over two years before the falling out between the parties occurred.

The Olson court noted that the implied warranty of habitability had not been extended to commercial leases “in the usual situation” and left the door open to the possibility of an implied warranty.

It may be that a situation will arise where such a warranty should be imposed in a commercial lease, but we decline to do so in this case.[5]

Although there is apparently no general, non-waivable implied warranty in commercial tenancies in Washington courts might find an implied warranty with appropriate facts under contract law concepts such fitness for intended purpose and Hadley v. Baxendale contemplation of parties analysis.


[1] See The Implied Warranty in Commercial Leases.

[2] See Schonshinski, American Law of Landlord and Tenant §3:29, n.68 and n.72.

[3] Olson v. Scholes, 17 Wash. App. 383, 563 P.2d 1275, 1281 (1977).

[4] Foisy v. Wyman, 83 Wn.2d 22, 515 P.2d 160 (1973).

[5] Olson at 392.

Landlord Attorney
Get the Flash Player to see the slideshow.
Other Practice Areas