Free Eviction Forms
These forms are drafted for use in the state of Washington. Even in Washington the choice of a form and the manner of its use may not be appropriate for your particular circumstances.

Add our eviction forms to your browser.
Instructions on How to Serve an Eviction Notice
Eviction Forms for use in Washington outside Seattle
Notice to Pay Rent or Vacate ("3-day Notice")
Notice to Comply or Vacate ("10-day Notice”)
Notice to Terminate Tenancy ("Twenty-day Notice”)
Residential Eviction Forms for use in Seattle
Notice to Pay Rent or Vacate ("3-Day Notice") - Seattle
Notice to Comply or Vacate("10-Day Notice") - Seattle
Notice Terminating Tenancy (”Twenty-day Notice”)
Other Forms
48-hour Notice to Enter
Post-tenancy Notice Regarding Deposits
Notice of Apparent Abandonment
Foreclosure
Both state and federal laws have recently been enacted fundamentally changing the process of gaining possession after foreclosure. Please contact us.
Landlord Attorney
Rate Us
Independent Attorney Rating

National Institute for Trial Advocacy - Advocate designation

Bookmark and Share

How to Repo Lease to Own Housing

Many assume that in a lease to own housing transaction it is a simple matter to regain possession if the potential buyer fails to close and/or fails to pay rent.  Not so fast. 

A landlord may bring either an unlawful detainer action or ejectment action to evict a tenant. [1]

It is far preferable for the owner to bring an unlawful detainer action.  An unlawful detainer action is an expedited form of litigation narrowly tailored to the issue of possession. [2]  Counterclaims are only proper if they relate to the issue of the right of possession. [3] 

However, unlawful detainer actions can only be brought in situations that fall under the statute. [4]

A buyer who is in possession of real property – as opposed to a tenant in a landlord-tenant relationship – cannot be evicted in the expedited unlawful detainer action. [5]    Rather, to evict a buyer in possession the owner must bring an ejectment action.  [6]

In an ejectment action the defendant is served a summons answerable in twenty days, rather than only seven in the unlawful detainer action.  The ejectment action is a general civil lawsuit, not a special proceeding with a show cause hearing on shortened notice.  As a general civil action, counterclaims are not limited to the issue of possession.  The ejectment action will generally take longer, cost more, and may have a more uncertain outcome.  The ejectment action should be avoided by an owner if possible. 

Some possible ways to avoid the ejectment action.

Do not give an option to purchase that can be exercised right away.[7]  Grant an option that may be exercised only at the end of a lease period.  If the tenant is not reliable with rent the owner may evict via unlawful detainer and avoid ejectment.

Require both written notice and additional consideration to exercise the option. 

The terms of the lease should stipulate that a default of the lease voids the option. 

Forbid improvements to the property during the term of the lease.  Enforce this lease provision with ten day notices to comply or vacate when appropriate.

When faced with evicting occupants, the owner should whenever possible avoid ejectment and proceed with an unlawful detainer action.

Bookmark and Share

Comments are closed.

Contact Us
Please Note: We represent landlords. Tenants should seek advise elsewhere. Thank you.


206-801-1188
425-641-8010
888-88-EVICT
(888-883-8428)


Eviction Request Form


Online Contact Form

  • Landlord Represents Himself in Court and Gets Burned
    A Seattle landlord who represented himself in an eviction case had his case dismissed and the tenant was awarded $6,450 in attorney fees. The landlord used an old summons form missing important clauses and that had a defective return date. The landlord argued on appeal that the tenant did not raise the issue of the […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney
  • New Laws Protect Tenants Whose Landlords are Foreclosed
    New federal and state laws protect tenants whose landlords are foreclosed.  According to the article “Your landlord got foreclosed. Do you have to go?” on CNNMoney.com, some banks, real estate agents, and attorneys may be preying on  tenants not familiar with these laws. Note these law apply after the foreclosure auction, not when the landlord […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney
  • Court of Appeals Upholds Late Fees in 3-Day Notice
    Our law firm was not involved in the lawsuit described in this article. Under Washington unlawful detainer law the landlord should not demand non-rent items on the three-day notice to pay rent or vacate.  This is because the tenants is entitled to at least 10 days to cure any non-rent breach of the lease. Some […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney
  • Landlord Liable for Failure to Return Tenant Property
    Our law firm was not involved in the lawsuit described in this article. In a recent opinion Division II of the Court of Appeals upheld a $76,275.55 verdict against a landlord and the property management firm it retained.[1] In addition, the Court of Appeals added attorney’s fees in an amount to be determined for the […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney
  • New Laws Protect Tenants When Landlord is Foreclosed
    New federal as well as state laws protect tenants when the landlord’s property is foreclosed upon.   New federal law. Under the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009 the purchaser at foreclosure takes the property subject to any unexpired lease.  The law also requires the foreclosure auction purchaser to give notice to vacate to any […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney
  • Eviction Notices Must be Mailed from the Same County
    The Washington Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion today on an unlawful detainer case in which one of the issues raised on appeal was that the declaration of service for the notice to pay rent or vacate did not indicate that the notice was mailed from the same county. Although as unpublished the opinion […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney
  • Landlord Liability for Injury due to Snow and Ice
    Washington has adopted the Connecticut rule which requires landlords to keep common areas in a safe condition regardless whether or not the hazard is naturally occurring.  [1] The landlord is not the guarantor of tenants’ safety, however, and therefore a tenant will be required to show the landlord had actual or constructive knowledge of the […]
    Washington Landlord Attorney